I’ve noticed that when staff, builders, or mayors, don’t like their builds, they usually delete them using w/e, or by destroying them by hand. But, once the build is deleted, it can’t spawn back. That’s why I, BroodingSet, came up with the idea that PCB could have their own ‘trash bin,’ for any builds that didn’t make the cut.
I came up with this idea, because there used to be a school in Portland. But, it got replaced by a new one. And, what if a player wanted the old school in their city, but they didn’t need to build one. Instead, they could find the old school in the ‘trash bin,’ and they can have it be w/ed, or they make a school, similar to the original design.
This was only my idea which Claudia, Andre, SalamanderMan, and prof_enderboss liked. I would like to hear the staff members’ opinion on my idea.
Good Idea, everyone can have builds w/o building it from the new ‘trash bin’. I liked that old school but i would not add it to my city, Seattle. Because i have other plans to do later. Even know the school was named “Brookfield School”
located at North of Downtown Portland. Just near the Nexus/Atlus Tower.
~ItzAndre
There is actually a way w/e’d and hand broken builds to return semi recently discovered by Prince when he was moving things away from Dubai so I could start fresh (Thanks Again) A staff member just needs to rollback actions made by whoever broke it or w/e’d it and it comes back. It’s a ‘tried’ and “tested” forum-ula!
I mean I am a huge supporter of this, yet I already take part in something like this. Usually I just send the unwanted builds to Freebuild and put a sign in front asking if someone wants to claim to let someone with w/e know
Thank you, PrinceMark. I’ve heard of Freebuild, and that is a good spot for any unwanted builds to be w/ed to. I was thinking of the infamous Walgreens you helped me get w/ed from Rancho, to Freehold, as an example for someone that wants a specific building, without building it. I hope that more players will be aware of this helpful advantage in planning builds.